-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:13:09 -0400
NP-Hardass <np-hard...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Not sure if this has been covered in some of the rather long chains of
> late, but I was thinking about GPG signing, and how the proposed
> workflow requires every developer to sign their commits.  Currently,
> it's advised that every manifest be signed.  As far as I know, there
> are a number that are not.  When a manifest is signed, the author is
> saving a state, and providing a means to check it has not changed.
> 
> Additionally, I feel that a signature is a means of acknowledging that
> a package has been looked over, and that developer has stated that
> they approve of the existing state.  I'm not sure if others agree with
> that sentiment, but if anyone does, my question is, how does the
> conversion process to git handle these packages, where the manifests
> are not signed.  Is there an intention to blanket cover all packages
> when we switch to git?  Will these packages be copied over directly
> and still maintain their unsigned manifest (I think this is unlikely
> as I read that there would be a switch to thin manifests, requiring
> regeneration)? If the community doesn't view the signature of the
> manifest as I just described, then a blanket signing would be fine.
> 
> Would appreciate your thoughts either way, as I could be overthinking
> the issue :P
> 
> - -- 
> NP-Hardass


No, with the git working tree, we will switch to thin manifests and the
entire commit will be signed.  Not only that, but the push to the main
server will also be signed (a push may contain commits signed by a
different person that the person pushing).

For the regular rsync tree, Full manifests will be regenerated as
needed and signed by a common infra supplied gpg key.  So for general
users, it will be easy to verify without having all gentoo devs gpg
keys.  That will be different for users of the git tree.


- -- 
Brian Dolbec <dolsen>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.1
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=pfay
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to