Sunday 05 Jul 2015 16:03:27, hasufell wrote : > On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, C Bergström wrote: > >>> 5) More about linear commits and "history" - I need to double check, > >>> but I don't think rebase changes the actual commit date (I could be > >>> mistaken). > >> > >> You are mistaken, and should have double checked before you argued. > >> > >> Arguing without checking makes you look bad. > > > > How? I didn't claim to know and clearly not knowing didn't seem > > important (to me). I'm not trying to overstate anything. I'm just > > trying to passionately bring this up. I ***wish*** someone with some > > guts would actually take charge of this on the gentoo side, have a > > vote or make some executive decision which is stronger than this wimpy > > policy we have now. > > > > Most of what you brought up wasn't really useful critique, but rather > noise based on your personal frustration with git. > > This thread is not about giving lectures on how git works. We appreciate > useful comments on the git workflow. But in order to give useful > comments, you have to know and understand the project and how it works > internally. > > There will be a sh*tload of developer, feature and whatnot branches. It > is just insane to tell everyone to unconditionally do rebases > everywhere. You haven't even commented on a fraction of the resulting > problems. So please lets stop this discussion and move on. >
+1 How about you guys carry on this discussion somewhere else in a place like, I don't know, IRC? #which-git-workflow-fits-best-my-needs
