-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 06/08/2015 12:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Justin Lecher (jlec) > wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? >> >> I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without >> having an agreement or policy on the indention, I make unhappy by >> choosing the wrong. >> >> The two options which are already suggested are >> >> * 2 spaces * single tab >> >> So what should it be? > > I want to throw in my support for the second option. > > Thanks, > > William > I'm also in favor of tabs. Aside from being shorter (by a single byte, in this case), they're less prone to off-by-one inconsistencies and any good text editor allows the user to configure the tab width, so everyone can be happy.
Just my two cents. ~Daniel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVdiq3AAoJEAEkDpRQOeFwFnMQANYOy+A9D8wU8RQjXtUm5fEO FcK+vXyigt+ENholJVl4NYkL6z7l8dTx5PbjZ4qYUgM0hqwraUI8h69gmXe2r4c+ 3r3FSaLofQ8ePlmaBQOJMw6OTJu9P2VULVh90bByj+2NKzu07aVHkRevzerzvl5F uhiRSQvPNNYCxSrYL+Q5SLKtdfpny+gg9npoNkeoQPSzu/GujicxBisTHb8jaBEs gcP1iSTsvrf8nhYzgxwmKpyDbeBH2V8rUMFOv800m6lbbfXChDHUrOEX81Jxs72/ wfjbEpSFz0Dkhd/WFu4ApMvgaQesT7NudRg5q+YV35aDyx6gXkvdKPyWzNv5FmVd dDmODWnV7oLm8BymhQaqNZOauh/7LlEjKIRTATGow+IWoqwTVgyVw0lp4DmA3n0L Mz8+WgaNfEERYct+Pbrc3MkQsQ7DsyAp8GWQ8b+j2SsNXjsVD2bjB58mKv4udda/ Nj8f8mdu43+O9zRXl385r7U5Nbb3foI9fyvJsN1GyPE+8LDHvs5LDvFDY41Yz3Nk IWaEbEiWGAo5zLOfgld2NOtq8VB7kIMLwF2xhsMfHzO0oQKisPBOH7Ab2x29DvL/ TreinTiDyLtKzlJ6+bprIqH6dTXflaNzHsVzoXQiu9XDdb3hIpXTXup5hlDUZxT6 TZ4zilhFAeYHUjzOOyli =lB7e -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
