> On 2015-06-04, at 12:10, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > All, > > we are starting to get more go packages in the tree, so we need an > eclass that properly deals with go live ebuilds.
Why live only? Your eclass does what every other live and non-live ebuild does for Go: create a temporary Go environment without the package in question. This is fine (I hate how Go is designed in this respect). I just think non-live Go packages definitely need an eclass. Andrew
