On 04/18/2015 02:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> I am really confused. I guess some people have never really been in a >> different workflow than gentoo to know that it's really not >> state-of-the-art. And it really isn't. Not even for distros. >> > > I am not saying that a review workflow is bad. I just don't see how > it fixes our actual problems, which is a lack of commits in the first > place. >
I think this should be so obvious by now given the past discussions (even in this very thread) that I'm not sure if I have to repeat myself. Having a proper review workflow/platform increases the contribution factor of the community. And not just that. I'm also not going to give real-world examples of such workflows in big projects: just head over to github.
