-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 15/04/15 09:40 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 15/04/15 05:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
> 
>>> This is problem with the CVS two-commit procedure. The only 
>>> solution is to stop using CVS keywords which people don't want
>>> to do because THEY ARE SO VERY USEFUL.
> 
>>> Or make repoman do first commit without Manifest, so instead of
>>>  unsigned Manifest you'd have Manifest failure.
> 
>> But that's what it does. It commits all other files, then it
>> signs the Manifest and commits that.
> 
>> However, if signing fails it will commit an unsigned Manifest. 
>> Which I think is a misfeature. If I have FEATURES=sign then I
>> want to commit a signed Manifest. If there are problems, repoman
>> should error out but not do some other action that I've not asked
>> for.
> 
>> Ulrich
> 
> 
> Couldn't repoman sign a copy of the Manifest first (even if it's 
> staged in temporary space somewhere), then either do it all in one 
> commit or do the same two-stage commit it does now??  At least
> that would allow it to catch gpg errors and abort.

Nevermind, I follow the issue with the keywords now...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlUuaykACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDWEQD/TX233xLS5CKkaikTSPEBaaNO
ouaMvTubvt4LB+Vjdg0BALUgQD6be9hoj/c5IeFVED5X6WnLdlAbNnOLoUdn6kX0
=IreG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to