On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Alec Warner <anta...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) > >> <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> > patrick 14/12/31 05:21:11 > >> > > >> > Removed: ChangeLog Manifest libusbhp-1.0.2.ebuild > >> > metadata.xml > >> > Log: > >> > QA: Remove package with invalid copyright > >> > >> you do not go reverting code without actually talking to people. if > >> you feel like a revert is necessary, then file a bug. putting a "QA" > >> tag at the start of the commit message doesn't give you a pass. > > > > Normally I'd side with you on this...but I'm fairly sure repoman doesn't > let > > you commit packages to the tree missing these headers. This leads me to > > believe you didn't use repoman, or ignored it? > > feel free to grab the code i originally committed and run `repoman > full` yourself. no fatal errors. in fact you can see the generated > tags in my commit message. > Seems like a bug worth fixing then. > > even then, deleting an ebuild purely due to different copyright is > complete bs. anyone who understands copyright knows the situation in > Gentoo is completely unenforceable. we have no CLA. this was > patrick/QA wasting people's time to check a meaningless box. > Well we agree there, although I doubt anyone will bother fixing it ;) -A > -mike > >
