-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 04/02/15 09:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-02-04, o godz. 14:41:06 Alexis Ballier > <aball...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): > >> On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:30:56 +0100 Michał Górny >> <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> >>> It wasn't only weak but quite inconsistent too. Some packages >>> had their own || deps, with different order. >>> >> >> this was to reflect upstreams preferences > > The point is, the default was so weak that Portage's decision > could have been randomly influenced by ordering of packages in > depgraph. >
In other words, we didn't actually have a default, we just had a means that portage would choose one of them if the end-user haddn't chosen already. This to me is still the ideal solution (not the || deps due to the issues they have, but the soft default) -- why is it that we need to actually choose or force a default implementation in the profiles anyhow?? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlTSMV4ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDlOwD+JHd0OPGfcz0m/i4+nJW7jWSF hrpLj7kJrSuWuMUDYQMA/03GKhbIr9ZXNb3OetA0qUHKcrcrEnbirKiFO8vbD5Ex =/WPf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
