-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/19/2015 12:44 PM, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:33:45 +0300 Andrew Savchenko > <birc...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:45:51 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> The problem isn't the constants, though. The problem is the >>> resolution algorithm. There's not much point tweaking >>> performance until the resolver is fixed to produce a correct >>> answer... >> >> Oh, this was discussed so many times already... There is NO >> single correct solution to such problems. And some mathematically >> correct solutions are impractical (e.g. half of the tree >> rebuild), so other ones which are good enough are preferred. As >> long as imperfect solution works fine, I'm ok with it. > > From my point of view it would do much help if portage resolves > USE dependencies automatically instead of telling the user to > change USE flags manually (I am talking about bug #258371). > > Robert > >
As a user, the last thing I want happening is Portage making USE decisions for me. I'm completely in support of an emerge *flag*, but not doing it unconditionally. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUvXBBAAoJEJUrb08JgYgHqsQH/1m/Dgu547RTcooHhZ+B4gt1 FvjPGy1qEKB4W2ErxDj6J6TLlP09ASIiJ/7hrndKonDNd1aP4gAi7tKI5XzetWVt cWYG3UWLhxJRvMc2y7kbOyDSIy68Sz/r1Bruwymqdn+N6ooqnHVK252OJgaMGQHP aDa+ibNAywE7t/CTWS6rQU/ilEHsXIps+c4gmvEGv5iWiCKxlQF5fNKfWjOGEr9c NN23RaSEJj7BCEfFaFgmjd7P0akz/yzg/sr8xuaaEwUv5/KFJp7SI/Q/6GzG48rg H6TiNIYm3Gs0ucEWISCZx+qon5EmkkSREaQ5xeqBBRklNN63evH1pttjFg9rX6o= =RjLq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
