Michael Mol wrote: > 4) Jer marked #530478 as a dupe of #426262, To me that looks bogus. #530478 is about app-office/dia while #426262 is about two eclasses.
Jeroen - please explain why you consider 530478 a duplicate of 426262? I note that you did not do so in Bugzilla while marking the dupe, but I think an explanation is very much warranted in this case. I would have understood if you simply noted that 530478 was *related* to 426262, but duplicate has a distinct and very different meaning. Right? And please see if you can adopt a better tone. Your tone in https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530478#c4 sounds quite nasty for no apparent reason. :\ //Peter
