On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Michael Palimaka <kensing...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 14/11/14 15:01, Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> And I do apologize for piling on a bit - trying to get rid of @system >> has been one of my soap box issues for a while. It really seems like >> an ugly, if practical, solution. > > I think the proposed text in my previous reply is an improvement on the > current text. It certainly doesn't attempt to solve the problem of > implicit dependencies 100%, but I don't think that's a good reason to > avoid improvement.
Hence my last comment. :) I don't have a problem with the change. -- Rich
