On 27/09/14 15:19, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 27/09/14 14:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 12:47:14 +0200 Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:Because I'd expect a stage3 to be posix compliantI agree. It's time to replace nano with Vim.Surely certain stuff might enjoy having ex available as well. Probably busybox could be enough for both use-cases.
What about documenting this detail somewhere? lu