On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Gordon Pettey <petteyg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You're following the wrong train down the wrong tracks. Git [0-9a-f]{40}
is
> to CVS 1[.][1-9][0-9]+. You're arguing that CVS is more secure because its
> commits are sequential numbers.Ulrich is well-aware of that. His argument is that with cvs there is no security whatsoever in the scm, and so there is more interest in layering security on-top. With git there is more of a tendency to rely on the less-than-robust commit signing system. On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > I've so far gotten zero feedback on my hosting offer, intended to > > > help find some starting processes. > > > > hassufel's repository on github should be more than adequate: > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo-gitmig > > The very first email in this thread pointed out that it is difficult > to do anything custom on github, so I offered to help because I'm > willing and able to help arrange hooks and scripting and whatever foo > may be needed to move on. > I can set up something in New York and/or Germany if additional hosts are needed.
