-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:05:32 +0200 Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:41:39 -0400 > Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > I wonder if there may be some form of extension we could add to > > portage, such that it could do a VDB-only "re-emerge" somehow, when > > the in-tree ebuild doesn't match the in-VDB one. If that could be > > implemented properly (and i'm not sure that it could, tbh), maybe > > that would help reduce issues with dynamic deps, too... > > Hmm, dynamic dependencies ... dynamic rebuilds ... dynamic > compilation; one day we will have hot code pushes where upstream > changes immediately reflects itself upon one's system. Does such a > gimmick succeed? Meteor! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGraft - -- Jan Matějka | Developer https://gentoo.org | Gentoo Linux GPG: A33E F5BC A9F6 DAFD 2021 6FB6 3EBF D45B EEB6 CA8B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJT/gT1AAoJEIN+7RD5ejahISgIAKbVgqLmuJADmJ37TddtmPPP 7WPq5UYdGT4wq9rElrU3GCu10u+pxQqOOKzVjnXiSlcCF1xqkG07caaYO/Xw/ccS VclMPDngRU7YUSl9F6UeDkDK9l+48qE/1/ohrSL9f8giA5H5SZ3G3fanWN/oFp6W FsGx7J6ddRmM/LaSHrso4ngbMU7XIMFZgUeR5X3t5bWef/Si9adxJzfbMoCQFUDN 7qXT8EkY9U9Po5/aAqtsriyGWZttuIvjGbmiNdrdJI/IT/Rshlqzqy/viqcK2aOX bCO1dn5wRLxfV7JBgmg14UJqcDK6HgkSkl4rrl574M4arq7kZtbMEKbSvDcpurw= =Wphr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
