Ian Stakenvicius: > So instead of, for > instance, dropping the DESCRIPTION-ending-in-period check, it could > instead be relegated to a "nag" that could be hidden with --nonag.
It will still be broken, even if you hide it.
Ian Stakenvicius: > So instead of, for > instance, dropping the DESCRIPTION-ending-in-period check, it could > instead be relegated to a "nag" that could be hidden with --nonag.
It will still be broken, even if you hide it.