On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:49:54 -0400
Joshua Kinard <ku...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> So a mask on
> "=sys-devel/gcc-4.9.0" with the reason of "Masked for testing" makes
> perfect sense, especially since this version of gcc enables strong
> stack-protection.
In that case "this version of gcc enables strong stack-protection
[which might kill your cow]" is a good masking reason. Go for it.
"Masked for testing" never makes sense, let alone perfect sense, because
the intent (testing) is prevented by the action (masking). On the
other hand, "unmasked for testing" would make perfect sense.
jer
