Am Montag, 30. Juni 2014, 10:21:17 schrieb Tony Vroon: > On 29/06/14 16:49, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > virtual/perl-Switch > > No, stop that right now. > Bug #511874 needs to be actually fixed: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511874 > > The explanation was closed as a duplicate, which it isn't: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496278 > > You are breaking working installs here and I will not stand for it.
* What am I breaking? All in-tree revdeps have been fixed to depend on perl-core/Switch * What is the point of keeping a virtual with only one provider? * As Fabian pointed out, perl-core/Switch-2.160.0 should still go stable. Fine with me (but I can't read your minds about future stabilizations, and the virtual only had ~arch reverse deps). -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
