> Yeah, lets wait for Greg or Tianon to reply and if docker+lxc works for > them we can unmask lxc.
I've just tested against app-emulation/lxc-1.0.4 and app-emulation/docker is functioning properly with the "lxc" use flag enabled and the "lxc" exec-driver in use. Just so I can make sure to take this learning experience to its fullest, would an appropriate fix from our end have been to put a USE mask on the "lxc" use flag of our package so that the dep was masked instead of the whole package? I want to do my part to help avoid this problem in the future, since I'm clearly new. O:) ♥, - Tianon
