Jeroen Roovers: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:31:58 +0000 > hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Also check the history of this thread for a few proposed solutions. > > The history of this thread and the history of gx86-multilib and > crossdev development suggest that crossdev was doing nothing wrong until > gx86-multilib came around and a problem was found between them. Masking > either for the benefit of the other would be, and let me quote the > history of this thread out of context just to fit in with the tone and > mode this sub-thread has taken, "asinine". >
This isn't about right or wrong. This is about actual breakage on stable systems. Solutions were proposed, nothing has happened for months. So I don't see what else we can do here other than taking more radical steps to INFORM users of these possible breakages... and that's exactly what a hardmask is for.
