On 06/15/2014 02:05 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > I vote that as primary policy/general practice, it only be bumped for > (2) -- the primary purpose of subslot rebuilds is to allow portage to > figure out the deptree order when a dependency upgrade is going to > break a package that may or may not be emerged later. "break" is the > key term here. If users want to re-emerge the rdeps of a package on > upgrade they can certainly do so, but I don't see this as something we > want to force on everybody just because we can...
I agree 100%.
