On 06/11/2014 12:10 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: >> But, for the most part we just need to get the back-end re-written to >> work with a git repo. Actually migrating the tree itself to git is >> largely a solved problem. > > Weren't we also waiting for some gpg signing stuff to land? >
That's completely orthogonal (but would be convenient to have as a built-in, which git since ~1.8 does) Since people can't even decide on a key policy in under 5 years I doubt signing is important enough ... Now git has some/all of the needed features, and people wait on a future potential git migration instead of figuring out the important bits now (a good part of that is defined in GLEP 63, but there's no action apart from work on gentoo-keys.I don't have motivation to try pusing this again this year ...)
