On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:48:53 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile" <bluen...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 06/10/14 10:35, Magnus Granberg wrote: > > tisdag 10 juni 2014 14.22.11 skrev Jeroen Roovers: > >> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 21:46:56 -0600 > >> > >> Ryan Hill <rh...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >>> Yes. But now you've got me worried. We have to build gcc itself with > >>> -fno-stack-protector. Does compiling something with that flag give > >>> an error on hppa? Maybe give 4.8.2-r1 a whirl. > >> Setting -fstack-protector on HPPA does this: > >> > >> warning: -fstack-protector not supported for this target [enabled by > >> default] > >> > >> Setting -fno-stack-protector on HPPA causes no problems and is > >> completely silent. > >> > >> > >> jer > > The arch that ssp will be enable by default is defined in the ebuild with > > SSP_STABLE or SSP_UCLIBC_STABLE. > > > > /Magnus > > > > > > Will that remove the flag from hppa? Yes, the spec rule is applied only if the arch defines SSP_STABLE. -- Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
