Samuli Suominen schrieb: > On 03/06/14 17:45, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: >> Samuli Suominen schrieb: >>> On 03/06/14 16:53, Rich Freeman wrote: >>>> So, I get why you did it, but my concern is that when you tell >>>> portage that non-systemd users shouldn't use this package, portage >>>> helpfully solves that problem by turning all the non-systemd users >>>> into systemd users, instead of switching them to the alternative that >>>> works without systemd. >>> Portage doesn't do anything on it's own, surely it needs an admin to accept >>> or reject the changes >> I disagree. It would have been straightforward to create a transitional >> package sys-power/upower-10000 which makes openrc users transition to >> sys-power/upower-pm-utils and systemd users to sys-power/upower-systemd >> or something similar. > No, it wouldn't have, because 0.99.0 is the superior version to which > we are all working towards and 10000 would have superceded it > And 0.99.0 is for both, systemd and openrc users > >
sys-power/upower-10000 would not install any files and be treecleaned some months after the transition is complete. upower-10000.ebuild: DEPEND="systemd? ( sys-power/upower-systemd ) !systemd? ( sys-power/upower-pm-utils ) upower-pm-utils-0.9.23.ebuild: DEPEND="!<sys-power/upower-10000 !sys-power/upower-systemd" upower-systemd-0.9.23-r3.ebuild: DEPEND="!<sys-power/upower-10000 sys-apps/systemd" I will attach the proposed ebuilds to bug 512252. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
