El mar, 13-05-2014 a las 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: > On 13/05/14 03:19 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El dom, 11-05-2014 a las 20:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: [...] > >> 4. whenever possible, depend on the specific subslot that is > >> known to provide SONAME equal to the required by your package, > >> e.g. for libgcrypt.so.20 you depend on libgcrypt:0/20, > > [...] > > > > Why is this needed? Thanks for the explanation :) > > > > > > I believe that this relates to cases of, by example, a 32bit > pre-rolled binary package on amd64. I expect one could use a specific > version range (upper/lower) for the dependency instead, so long as it > is just as accurate.
Ah, ok :)
