On 02/04/14 21:22, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> The "30 days maintainer time out" stabilization policy isn't working
>> when package has multiple SLOTs, because
>> the bugs are filed for only latest SLOT, where as some packages require
>> stabilization in sync at both SLOTs
>>
>> Option 1:
>>
>> Either revert the whole policy, and never CC arches on unanswered bugs
>> when the package has a maintainer,
>> and let him do it when he finds the time himself, and if that doesn't
>> happen, wait until it's dropped to maintainer-needed@
>>
>> Option 2:
>>
>> Or, the person who is CCing the arches in 30 days timeout, needs to make
>> sure the bug covers all SLOT at the same time
>>
>>
>> The status quo no longer allows me to maintain stable version of
>> dev-libs/girara, app-text/zathura*, and the issue needs
>> to be addressed, see http://bugs.gentoo.org/502714 for what inspired
>> this mail
>>
>> - Samuli
>>
> If you want to prevent packages from being "timed out", just leave a

That would require me to take action on the STABLEREQ, which I don't
want to do
if I see someone requesting it stable only because it's newer version,
see below:

> comment on the bug saying so. If you don't even have time to do that
> within a 30 day window, why are you the maintainer?

It's like we handle stabilization for Xfce, we collect enough xfce-base/
and xfce-extra/
packages together to form a longer list, to avoid bothering arch teams
unnecessarily
constantly
This time it's app-text/zathura-meta and it's dependencies, multiple
packages, we'd
like to wait there are enough plugins, and form a list

And this time the package even had 3 maintainers, 2 gentoo developers
and one proxy,
in metadata.xml, yet none of us managed to intervene in time to prevent
the SLOT breakage[1]
done by arches without our consent

[1] Stabilizing headers, but not the library, causing the .h not to
match the .so, causing every
reverse dependency of the library to break

>
> Another option would be to add some kind of notation to metadata.xml.
>

That could work

Reply via email to