18.02.2014 13:39, Ben de Groot пишет: > On 12 February 2014 07:04, Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > [...] >> >> It's sad that people don't follow common sense (which happens to be the >> GNOME highlights) >> and that everything must be turned into a policy of somesort so people >> get it. >> > [...] >> >> Just make the gnome gtk3 policy the guideline if you must. It's just >> documenting common sense. >> > > It seems that only the Gnome team regards this as common sense. > Others, such as the Qt team and QA regard the versioned useflag > solution as more sensible. > > I think we can conclude that there is no perfect solution, and we > simply have different preferences. > > That said, I'm not sure we absolutely need a policy. Though I would > agree it would be more elegant if we can solve this matter, to make it > easier to grasp by our users. In that case the QA proposal makes sense > to me. >
We definitely NEED the policy, cause if we do not - current situation will continue to confuse users and even developers about how to do things properly. But we should come to the policy together and then - force it together. We really do not want to force anyone in a way he does not like, but if we will do nothing about this - it will remain a problem as it is now. -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
