On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:10:23 +0100
Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> As detailed before, -* has a different meaning defined by policy; if
> we want to see that changed it should be brought up for a vote,
> otherwise its usage in discussions like these seems to suggest to
> break an existing policy. So, I read this as "arch" whenever it is
> brought up.

You would have to do this across an EAPI, since it's a change that
matters to the package mangler. Right now, if a -* is there, the package
mangler shouldn't suggest changing accepted keywords for that package
if it's suggesting how to deal with an unsatisfiable resolution.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to