Chris Reffett wrote: > - -The QA team policymaking workflow will look like the following: .. > If we think a developer's actions are causing problems, we may ask > them to stop/undo pending discussion by the QA team at the next meeting.
plus > - -Rules for the QA team editing peoples' packages: .. > *For trivial fixes, such as repoman errors, we fix the issue and send > the developer a friendly reminder > *For large but non-critical fixes, we open a bug, wait 2 weeks, and if > it is not fixed within that time frame we make the change. sounds to me like QA is giving itself carte blanche to make any "fix" they want as per "we think a developer's actions are causing problems" hmm? //Peter
