On 01/22/2014 11:36 AM, hasufell wrote: > > > People already do that without revoking commit access, e.g. when the > recruitment project tells you they don't want to process your recruit > or when project leads don't respond to membership applications at all > or when the ComRel lead is not interested in a private discussion. > > And then they seem surprised when you get pissed. And they even seem > clueless about why the working atmosphere in the gentoo-dev community > is pretty bad. It is not, because someone has a strong opinion. > Everyone has, at times. It's about that attitude of telling people > that you are not good enough for their time. > > So this is already happening. The proposal here is just a "logical" > consequence to this situation. >
sorry for messing up that mail, it was a reply to On 01/22/2014 08:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:> I don't want to appear rude, but when reading this entire mail all I see > > Do you realise the message that is sent by denying someone access? You > are saying that person is not good enough to work on Gentoo. Do you > really want to send that message?
