-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 13/01/14 09:39, C. Bergström wrote: > Drive-by trolling comment but I wish the effort to keep porkage > alive would have instead been directed towards pkgcore. Realistically, we have to keep updating them both in parallel. pkgcore needs to be brought up to portage-level functionality, and we need to keep fixing portage bugs for its many users. We could have a technical discussion on the merits of pkgcore vs. portage, but in the end, it's about the users.
For the record, I would be very happy if you hacked on pkgcore. Just as happy as if you hacked on portage, even. So please do. :-) - -- Alexander alexan...@plaimi.net http://plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlLTpx8ACgkQRtClrXBQc7UXtAEAp+ZlhX1E7NGp4rF0x8yEVzFk Ynf1W9rr0Q2XZ3nBsk4A/RsrKd82zgYPaBizcs2toz/U9pjmbOkS9PUQPJAFe4ze =EKI+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
