Igor <lanthrus...@gmail.com> writes: > The ebuilds have approximately the same time to install, the failure > rate is about the same, emerge is getting slower.
I am curious about the slowness of emerge. How about profile the portage and rewrite the time-crucial part in C/C++, or ideally, borrowing the counterpart from paludis? How feasible is that? I guess the dep-tree calculation is the slowest part.
