-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 13/12/13 13:31, Samuli Suominen wrote: > orc is dev-lang/orc, with binaries like orc-bugreport That's fine. There is no binary, orc.
> as said, with tab completion, orc-* would just get mixed up with > binaries from dev-lang/orc Tab-completing orc- will only have one executable not related to openrc. If you tab-complete "open" (which is already longer to type) on most systems, you get a lot more. So you'd have to tab-complete openrc. That's a lot longer than orc-. Also, I would just tab-complete orc. orcc is obviously a compiler. Most people have rcc (also obviously a compiler) on their system, so we have that "issue" now as well. So to sum up: I still think it's fine to call it orc. But honestly, there are no catastrophic candidates. Any further discussion is mostly just bikeshedding. Let's just nominate some candidates and vote. :-) - -- Alexander alexan...@plaimi.net http://plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlKrDBYACgkQRtClrXBQc7XK1gEArFhx0BE2eELesWVQ1p0KyxKC TEkWlaqZZsxhvSTHf5cA/2jlE5QcODLk765pbmppIB/aw32BfVYSNxUHXssY4tsx =iAkb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
