Dnia 2013-12-08, o godz. 20:26:44 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> napisał(a):
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:21:52 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > The PMS describes package manager behavior required to support an > > > ebuild repository. If I read the PMS correctly, SLOT-less > > > dependencies have undefined behavior; this makes it so that if you > > > have a different package manager using the same ebuild repository, > > > it could interpret the dependencies completely different. > > > > Nothing undefined here. A dependency without a slot means that all > > slot values are acceptable. And all package managers interpret it in > > the same way. > > Actually, Paludis interprets a lack of slot dependency as a "don't > know", and assumes that it might be unsafe to switch slots at runtime > in these cases. So we should basically encourage people to explicitly state ':*' when they mean that, correct? Because I can tell you that right now many people don't use that because they see it as redundant. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
