Dnia 2013-11-17, o godz. 19:18:35 Martin Vaeth <va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de> napisał(a):
> Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >>> Am Freitag, 15. November 2013, 21:18:03 schrieb Martin Vaeth: > >>> > >>>> If this is not very hard to implement in portage, I would > >>>> strongly vote to remove this implicit connection: > > > > I assume this is about the *.use.stable.mask files ... > > Even less: The discussion in this part of the thread was > only about the implicit connection of package.accept_keywords > with *use.stable.mask, i.e. about removing the > side effect of unmasking USE-flags by these files. Oh, then it doesn't have to do anything with PMS. Portage config files are purely a choice of portage developers, and this can be done as soon as you convince them this is the right thing to do. I've tried [1]. [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491166 -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
