08.11.2013 09:04, Johann Schmitz пишет: > On 07.11.2013 21:18, Rich Freeman wrote: >> Seriously, though, I'd love to see these needs better supported. >> I think we need to start by defining what the needs actually are >> (less redundancy, more consistency, etc). Then we figure out how >> to best address them. It could be individuals donating VMs, or it >> might be Gentoo buying resources from any number of vendors, or it >> could be Gentoo going out and looking for donors. > > I agree with that. It's easier to decide what to do if we know what we > need. A solution built by the infra team would be the best solution > for the same reasons why it's better to put stuff on the devspace > instead of private servers (availabilty; who can fix stuff, logins, etc). > > But if someone need resources and a box to play with I would happily > provide an Xen instance. Just wondering: How is the AT for $minorarch > done? Is it possible to run, say, mips on xen/whatever through some > emulation layer or is real hardware a requirement for this archs? > > > For the security concerns: I think these boxes should be used for > testing only and not for development - every commit must be done from > a box fully under the dev's control. > >
Usually it is done via qemu, but as was said - it is damn slow. I use qemu for emulating ARM device for compilation, cause it's faster than compile on device(Raspberry Pi) itself mostly because of I/O. -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
