Dnia 2013-10-14, o godz. 09:26:43 Richard Yao <r...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ben de Groot <yng...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> I don't see a compelling case being made for why we should make this > >> change apart from "all the other distros are doing it", and quite a > >> few reasons why we shouldn't. I'm open to being convinced, so please > >> tell me why this is good for Gentoo users. > > > > So far I've seen a reference to a bug associated with a bunch of > > systemd issues when it isn't mounted, and the point that many things > > break in namespaces without the symlink, since /etc/mtab does not > > reflect the state of the namespace. The latter in particular seems > > like a pretty fundamental limitation - the very concept of /etc/mtab > > is that mounts are global, and the design of linux is that mounts are > > NOT global. > > Why should this not be treated as a systemd bug? Is it a Linux kernel bug that it supports mount namespaces? Since userspace clearly wasn't designed for that 20 years ago, so Linux clearly has a bug supporting that! -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
