On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 08:58:07PM -0400, James Cloos wrote: > >>>>> "TW" == Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> writes: > > TW> Also, please just call it git-3.eclass as it is a major change; any > TW> other form of naming will introduce confusion (eg. -r1 < -2), also we > TW> probably shouldn't change git-2.eclass as even when masked it doesn't > TW> seem like a good thing to break its current API and documentation as > TW> well as what actually works in the Portage tree. > > +1 on all of that. git-3 is a better name than using -r1. > > And leave git-2 there for at /least/ a year. There are a LOT of out of > tree git-2 users.
The last time I checked, out of tree eclass users are not a concern for how long we keep old eclasses in the tree. We only keep them until we are sure there are no in tree users. Thanks, William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
