-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 25/08/13 10:30 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-08-25, o godz. 16:15:31 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> > napisał(a): > >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> >>> first version (multilib1.patch) directly changes the output of >>> the currently used multilib_is_native_abi() function: >> >> I think this would be very misleading. If a function is called >> multilib_is_native_abi then it should test for exactly that, not >> for something else. > > It's for multilib-portage. It hacks over everything in the > environment. None of multilib variables are really meaningful in > this context, so I don't have a problem with hacking that > behavior. >
Multilib-portage could just override the definition of multilib_is_native_abi so that it's always true -- this change isn't necessary for that particular use case. It *is* necessary to support end-users that want to do what multilib-portage offers but just with regular portage. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlIbYWkACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDjKwEAq5Ocxg4NItUkZ+qS+4Hj2iag zVqJpa0E2oDDAyXpK5IBAIR7S0NOfHuN3hd/5fVNKebxdlwUo4yPee8rWFHv8Q48 =dqDh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
