On 26 August 2013 19:55, Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > El lun, 26-08-2013 a las 09:38 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: > > > I would open a bug and try to contact the developer. Not sure if > internal functions could be named in a "standard" way allowing repoman > to die on its usage by ebuilds :/ > > This really resonates my continued desire to be able to add QA checks to repoman without needing to modify the repoman code. I know Repoman already has a whole lot of eclass-based checks, but they appear to be hardcoded in the checks themselves ( repoman/checks.py ), which means to simply enforce some degree of sane usage of an eclass, one has to modify portage itself to add the checks..
-- Kent
