On 08/05/2013 11:49 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-08-05, o godz. 12:33:45 > Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): > >> This is a friendly reminder. >> >> I've found the tree again to have dependencies like: >> >> dev-libs/openssl:= >> virtual/jpeg:= >> >> Neither of which are correct, since dev-libs/openssl has SLOT="0" and >> SLOT="0.9.8" and virtual/jpeg has SLOT="0" and SLOT="62". >> >> Need to pull in the SLOT that installs headers: >> >> dev-libs/openssl:0= >> virtual/jpeg:0= >> >> Same logic applies to any package with also "binary-only SLOTs" that >> install libfoobar.so.1 and nothing else. > > Sounds like it's easy to miss that someone added binary-only SLOTs > to a package. Is there anything we can do to improve this? >
Name the slot properly. 62-binary
