Rich Freeman wrote: > > As has been stated, this implies that Gentoo QA has tested the packages > > and found them to be reasonably safe for use. > > ++
While good in theory, it seems that newer v-s are actually more "reasonably safe" than any g-s. > Stable should mean something For users, stable means "older" in practice. Always did, always will. > If gentoo-sources is where our stable efforts will be, then the > keywords should reflect this. We're not getting rid of > vanilla-sources. Ideally distribution efforts to stabilize packages should go upstream instead of staying within the distribution. Sadly not all upstreams are competent enough to handle that. :\ //Peter
