El dom, 21-07-2013 a las 13:57 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: [...] > 5. I have doubts about 'emerge -1vDtu @world' speed. It is very > subjective feeling but I feel like reiserfs was actually faster in this > regard. However, space savings would surely benefit our users. >
I also feel it faster (or, at least, not slower) with reiserfs, but going from ~300 MB to 79. Not sure if it would benefit from putting squashed image in a different filesystem (it was placed in /root, that is ext4 in my case). Maybe it would be faster if generated image was put in /var/tmp/portage (that is tmpfs in my case) But I am testing it with plain squashfs (without write support)
