On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400 > Michael Sterrett <mr_bon...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. > > > wont this disable important regular checks also?
The -I (--ignore-masked) option only disables dependency checks for masked "parent" packages. > foo is masked by package.mask, bar depends on foo. repoman -I wont > catch a broken dep in bar. No, we don't currently have an option like that, and I don't think we want one like that. > IMHO it should do the -I check in addition to the current ones and print > warnings/errors. The -I option only disables checks that are normally enabled. -- Thanks, Zac
