On 06/21/2013 01:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. But I think that, currently, the only > remaining "objection" is whether play with /sbin/init (that needs > sysvinit to be changed if I don't misremember) or with /sbin/einit. > Looks like mgorny has shown some problems on relying on "einit" instead > of plain "init" regarding to fallback :/
I prefer having /sbin/init used for the pivot since /sbin/einit is a bit more brittle and as Fabio did the whole machinery is _still_ opt-in. lu
