On Sat, 25 May 2013 22:02:26 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chith...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Rich Freeman schrieb: > >> Yet another stand. No offense but I'm afraid it's quite childish of you. > >> I don't understand why you're so proud of it. It's a bit like 'Gentoo > >> will play as I like. If it doesn't, then I will play against Gentoo. > >> And if that doesn't help, I will resent and slam the door, and then > >> write to ml about it.' > > > > Honestly, if people want to have that attitude they might as well stop > > maintaining anything that installs a daemon. As a developer you have > > NO power to prevent somebody else from co-maintaining, and since those > > devs who use systemd are likely to want to have units and they're > > willing to do the work, you can expect somebody to show up and add a > > unit. > > This is why I suggested that in case of uncooperative maintainers and > upstreams, put the systemd unit in an extra package. Like it is done for > selinux policies. If we are to introduce split packages, we should start where doing it where it actually *makes sense*, rather than doing that to work-around stubbornness of uncooperative developers. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
