On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:00:46 +0200 Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 11:07:26 +0200 > Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > Is a stabilisation an enhancement per se? If all stabilisations > > > > are enhancements, then why isn't Severity set to Normal instead? > > > > (What is an enhanced severity to begin with, Mozilla?) > > > > > Why are they enhancements? Them having been this way is not a reason > > > not to change the priority and severity fields to make more sense. > > > > Do you agree that a version bump, i.e. an ebuild entering ~arch is > > an enhancement? Then why would it be different if the same ebuild gets > > promoted from ~arch to arch? > > Is a version bump an enhancement per se? Yes. Nothing is broken. There is no "bug" to fix. > If all version bumps are > enhancements, then why isn't Severity set to Normal instead? (What is > an enhanced version bump to begin with, Mozilla?) It's not an "enhanced" bug, the bug is a request for an improvement (aka enhance_ment_). Severity is meant to give you a way of categorizing open bugs by how important they are, as you may want to fix actual bugs before worrying about adding features. Maybe you don't use bugzilla like that but some people do and lumping these bugs in with the "normal" ones prevents them from doing so. -- Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
