On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:36:41 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Monday 29 April 2013 01:55:49 Michał Górny wrote: > > Now, what are your thoughts? Shall we fix PMS to explicitly state > > the argument order or implement ugly hacks in ebuilds? > > portage has always inserted implicit args before the args given by > the ebuild to econf. PMS omitting the ordering information is simply > an oversight to be clarified, not functionality that may be relied > upon.
As you can see in the bug, we're not discussing anything related to EAPI 0 behaviour, so this argument is irrelevant. We're discussing a change in a later EAPI, where the change had nothing to say about ordering. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
