Hi! On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > I'm still not quite sure what newnet does that oldnet doesn't, or > why somebody felt it was necessary to make a new package (and no, > let's not discuss that here). Whatever it is, ideally, it would > reflected in the name(s). And package descriptions.
Scratch that. After reading Rob's post, I know. TYVM. Regards, Tobias
