On Mar 11, 2013 6:22 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined, > > > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license > > > agreement and an option to also sign an assignment-like document based > > > on the FSFe FLA, please speak up this week. > > I've already said this before, but I guess I need to say it again: > > If a contributor license is required to be signed, I'll have to > > stop contributing to Gentoo. > Did you read the entire email? We explicitly listed one of the options > as (voluntary FLA/CLA AND mandatory DCO). > > Could you clarify that you're objecting to that as well? In your case, > you could elect NOT to sign the FLA/CLA. Regardless, all of your commits > would have the DCO SoB signature. > > The kernel is where we got the mandatory DCO concept.
This one is my bad. I wrote CLA when I meant DCO. No change intended. This is what happens when you send a thirty second follow-up to a policy formed over two weeks, and then step away to eat... But, at least we know people read it! Rich
