Greg KH wrote: > > If there really are firmware blobs that are only available via git and > > which cannot be redistributed we might consider whether it makes sense > > to not support them entirely, or to force them to be masked. > > Did anyone actually consider the fact that there should not be > non-redistributable firmware blobs in the upstream git tree in the > first place, as it is the thing that is doing the redistributing > originally?
I think non-redistributable in this case means "by Gentoo" since that was identified to be the case for some of the files in the git repository. Their license allows them to be distributed in linux-firmware.git, but not elsewhere. //Peter
